@gwilki Does it help you at all when posts are flagged as spam? I just flagged upwards of 50 and it seems there are many more to go. Iām not getting any limits like @Jens and @Spamming_Eddie
@Chucky_ott In normal circumstances, it does help, just in case I miss them. In this ridiculous situation, it really doesnāt. That said, I truly appreciate the efforts. The process t o delete the messages and the users is a one-at-a-time thing. So, I spent some hours today and there are still likely hundreds to get rid of. Iām hoping that @chrismakesstuff has a more efficient way to wipe them.
For what I have picked up, one or two flags give a head up to the mod team on the post. Given enough flags, removes a post from the visible pages.
With a spamtzunami like yesterday, that wont help keep the forum clean, but I believe when spam attemps start, it can buy some time and be somewhat discouraging when the spam isnāt an automated generated one.
according to this theorized function, enough people do indeed make a crowd.
Alright yāall, as far as I can tell the spam war/tsunami is now over!
First and foremost: my greatest thanks to the indelible and masterful@gwilki Grant Wilkinson for helping head the charge holding back the onslaught as well as all the rest of you for helping to join in on flagging and reporting offenders - itās been greatly appreciated and helpful.
Hereās how some of the final numbers look like:
Luckily, even on the tsunami of posts 3 days ago, I found tons of posts that the automated filters already caught.
We had a second wave at midnight last night which was much smaller but still a notable 20-30, but some of the new rule changes I already put in place seem to have caught most of them already which is great news! Iām about finished putting the rest of the changes through to hopefully catch the rest moving forward
In total we cleared somewhere around 600-700 spam posts removed and deleted 415 total spam accounts after the combination of user community flagging, some more careful user inspection for accounts whose posts got missed, or some who didnāt post at all and just continued to lurk in the shadows. There may still be stragglers, but I feel confident weāve sniffed most of them out. I will say, and Iām a bit sad to report this, probably one or two new Forum members mightāve gotten caught in the crossfire of this purging due to the increased sensitivity of new rules weāve had to enact - but hopefully those people will be able to reach out and Iāll be able to get them set back up again.
Now this was certainly a big attack on our typically easygoing Forum, but I feel pretty confident weāll be better sorted for next time (though Iām not going to reveal all secrets in case bad actors are reading over this very post):
Weāve got more strict rules on account creation which should only impact malicious actors
Our ferocious-flagging community members have now been given more power to shut down spam posts right out the gate
For those trying to sneak in quickly and do lots of damage, Iāve added more blockades to slow that process down and limit spammy behaviour
Weāve found some other juicy patterns in how malicious actors tend to create new accounts, and have put in new measures to make their lives harder
I think the combination of all these changes will make for a much better environment for discussion free from intrusion, and for those looking to act maliciously I hope they find the juice is not worth the squeeze so they can leave us to our peaceful CNC discourse.
If yāall have any more concerns, observations, etc. about this whole thing then definitely let me know. Iāll ad this same text to the top of this post so that newcomers can read it right away. Hope you have a great Thursday
I bumped into one of the walls erected to slow down.. letās call them āEddiesā.
I get it, but I am proun to type in raw posts and edit them afterwards into more forum friendly and readable final posts. It would be nice if that function would be available for posts under moderation. Or, maybe even a review post option that doesnāt post a draft yet?