Check that Z-depth! It matters

This project had two pocketing operations designed to be .250 deep, seems it was actually making them .500 deep so transiting between the operations the desired .200 above the workpiece was actually .050 below. Looks like we’ll be testing our repair skills.

G-code checks out ok so possibly a wrong tool height setting or machine losing Z? Can’t pin it to anything for sure. Words were said, tears may have been shed.

James
Dayton, Ohio

4 Likes

Welcome to the group James!

Just a thought, but did you have a reliable place to reset the Z zero after the tool change?

I know on some projects, where you mill the whole top surface, you don’t have the original spot to set Z zero again. This applies if your using a touch block or the paper method with Z zero at material surface. It’s one of the reasons that I prefer to set Z zero to the spoil board surface. Granted it does take some time to get used to Z zero being at the bottom of the material, but it also allows me to make precise through cuts that barely scratch my spoil board.

I see from your other post that you have experience with large machines, but my thinking is those things are probably automated with big machines.

I usually use the touchplate to set XYZ and project start and paper to set Z after a tool change. That’s how we do it on the machines we use in the guitar lab (an old Forrest Industries gantry mill). All the HAAS machines in the metal shop use toolsetters and Renishaw probes.

I’m contemplating using your method soon. I have an enclosure that I’ll be building soon that changes my table and that seemed like a good time to start a new habit. Thanks for the reply.

If you do switch to Z zero at spoil board this other post of mine might be useful.

1 Like

I’ll check it out. Thanks again.

1 Like